The debate over whether physician-assisted suicide is ethical and should be legal has persisted for many years.
USE AT LEAST 10 OF THE CITED REFERENCES BELOW;
The debate over whether physician-assisted suicide is ethical and should be legal has persisted for many years. Although many people feel the taking of a life is morally and biblically wrong, legalizing physician-assisted suicide can be a compassionate way to end suffering and pain due to terminal illness and provide a level of control for the patient over his or her own death.
I. Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)
A. Definition and History
B. Dr. Jack Kevorkian
A. Passive Euthanasia
B. Active Euthanasia
III. Patient Self-Determination Act
IV. Constitutional Rights
A. Equal protection clause – 14th Amendment to the Constitution
1. Basic component of human freedom
2. Right to decide one’s own destiny (autonomy)
B. 9th Amendment to the Constitution
V. Social Policy
1. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
2. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1. Death with Dignity Act – Measure 16 (Oregon)
C. Doctors’ participation in PAS
VI. Legal Precedents
A. In re Quinlan, 70 NJ. 10, 355 A.2d 647, 664 (1976)
B. Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997)
C. Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006)
VII. Biblical Viewpoint
Annas, G.J. (1976). Law and the life sciences: In re Quinlan: Legal comfort for doctors. The Hastings Center Report, 6(3), 29-31.
Bostrom, B.A. (2006). Gonzales v. Oregon. Issues in Law & Medicine, 21(3), 203-210.
Bross, W. & Ivey, J. (2006). Healthcare issues—patient self determination acts and informed consent. Alabama Nurse, 32(4), 9.
Bruder, P. (1996). Reaping the whirlwind: Legalizing assisted suicide. Hospital Topics, 74(3), 8-10.
Delka, L. (1995). Constitutional law: Physician-assisted suicide, crime or compassion? Washburn Law Journal, 35, 197-211.
Devlin, M. (1996). Quill v. Vacco. Issues in Law & Medicine, 12(1), 65-67.