Explain why you have done your study and what expect to dine.

Project description
Hi few weeks ago Iv done the part 1 of this assignment il send u pictures of part one to help do this assignment lab report part 2
Lab report part 2, APA frorm.
You only need to do the (Abstract, introduction, Discussion, reffrence) the-word limit is 1250 word excluding reffrence.

What Goes into the Introduction?

Explain why you have done your study and what expect to dine.
Start with broad statement give your report a general background/
After your extensive background readings.
What theoretical frame work did they use?
How id they investigate their research question?
What did they found?
(don’t just blindly including everything you have read make sure they are relvent?

Introduce your specific study:
Why they study that im doing important?
Aim, why are you doing this study
Once that has been identified you te, em:
What im expecting to find your ( hypotheses), more specific example( initial general statement, think about the lab report part1, what are-the issues being investigated.)

What has previous studies shown ?
This is also where you should start to motivate your hypotheses. E.g. to moivate your hypotheses on static vs dynamic conditions.

KEY WORDS for lit review (VISUAL MTION, TEMPORAL ORDER, HIGH LEVEL MOTION, OBJECT TRACKING, VISUAL FAILD ANISOTROPY, PERFORMANCE FAIELD.)

Aims
1.Replicate earlier findings by case vander burg: contextual flicker interferes with temporal, order judgment.
2. Determine whether there are diffrence temporal resolution along horizontal vertical, visual meridians,

Hypotheses,
be clear and specific, best if stated using IV & DVS presnted in a if . Than frame
write in full sentiences ( not bullet points)
there should be at least three hypotheses.
Context and Meridian interaction.

If temporal resolution is effected by the presence of flicker surrounding the target disk, then the JND for the dynamic condition will be higher then the JND for the static condition.

What goes into the Abstract?

as a rule of thumb, dedicate one or two sentences for each of the sections ( introduction, method, results, discussion)

Should answer the following questions:

1.What is the main question?
2.Participants?
3.How was this tested? What was the task?
4.What variables were manipulated and measured?
5.What did you find?
6.What can conclude from these findings